Program for Society and the Environment
  • Home
  • About
    • Graduate >
      • 2013-2014 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
      • 2014-2015 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
      • 2015-2016 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Fellows
    • Partners & Visitors
  • Research
    • Climate Constituencies Project
    • Service Corps Evaluation
    • Projects
    • Papers
  • Workshop
    • Workshop Schedule
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2018 Protest Symposium
    • 2015 Urban Environmental Stewardship Conference
    • Past PSE Events
  • Contact Us
    • Planning Your Visit

The politics of scared scientists

9/23/2014

5 Comments

 

Author: Joseph Waggle

Photographer Nick Bowers’ exhibit Scared Scientists demonstrates, in stark black and white contrast, the reactions of scientists to the empirical truths of climate change. Bowers’ exhibit links these barefaced images of apprehension with the individual fears of each scientist. The future in these faces is a bleak one, marked by “SPECIES EXTINCTION” and “GLOBAL CATASTROPHE.”*  It’s a dark and effective warning against ignoring the evidence behind climate change and ecological degradation.

I don’t want to discuss climate projections or the repercussions of climate change here, because that conversation is a much larger one that is still going on in labs and communities all across the world. I also don’t want to debate the causes of climate change, or the contribution that human activities make to the process, because those issues reached consensus long ago. Instead, I want to focus on the role that fear—particularly, fear from scientists—plays in the climate change policy debate.

If the question is why scientists are the best subjects for this kind of exhibit, then the most obvious answer is in their expertise. Scientists are the people with the best information. If the experts are afraid, shouldn’t we all be?

But climate scientists are not the only figures at the forefront of the push toward legislating climate change. Climate scientists are part of a constellation of political actors that includes activists, policymakers, and business leaders. They also join the much less visible private citizens and laypeople who, every day, observe and suffer the effects of extreme weather.

In fact, research my coauthors and I published last year demonstrates empirically that political debates about the science of climate change are, in fact, made up large networks of such actors, all arguing slightly different elements of climate change policy with one another. Furthermore, we found that this political noise was used strategically to mask ideological differences about the economic impact of climate change legislation, not the scientific consensus on climate change causes or impacts.

Still, looking at these images, it is hard to deny that the worry in those faces is an incredibly effective medium for an exhibit such as this. But scientists are not the only actors involved in climate policy. They are not even the largest slice of that population. They aren’t even the most vocal. Scientists are, however, unique among other political actors in that they are not, ostensibly, political. 

Of course, scientists are human beings who come to their field with a lifetime’s worth of political beliefs and social biases. Since Weber, sociologists have acknowledged that no expert can completely remove herself from her work. And that’s okay.

But Bowers highlights something else that sociologists have been saying for long time now: natural scientists enjoy a unique—and uniquely contested—kind of expertise. They are perceived by most publics as objective and disinterested experts, and when they step outside of this boundary, they often lose legitimacy and credibility. This risk is the constant reality of the activist scientists.

As my current research suggests, climate scientists are torn between two political poles. On one hand, they must stay committed to the objectivity of scientific conduct. On the other hand, they are inhabitants of the world they study, as are their friends and families, and thus they have a personal stake in passing effective policy. Their expertise is thus in constant tension, pulled between the professional restrictions of their discipline and the immediate social and ecological implications of their work.

I would argue that it is this tension that makes these photographs so effective at conveying the urgency and danger of ignoring climate change. In Bowers’ own words:

A quick chat to the experts and it’s immediately apparent that climate change is not only real: it’s serious. Very serious. 

But this isn’t what scares scientists. 

They're afraid humanity will continue to bury its head in the sand; instead of facing its greatest challenge head on. 

Scientists don't want to be right, they want to be wrong. Research shows this is our last decade to slow climate change before it's too late. The science community believe [sic] if people are willing, we can transform the current trajectory from one of fear to one of hope. But the science can only take us so far. If we want a safe and sustainable world, we need to take the facts seriously - and do what needs to be done to change them.

The message is clear here: what scares the experts should really scare the rest of us. Fear is effective here because in normal science, fear should not exist. But more to the point, fear is effective here because, no matter how much we learn about the causes and mechanisms of climate change, what really matters is understanding how that information best translates into political and social change.

*Notable in their absence here are social scientists, whose expansive list of climate-related concerns goes largely unaddressed. Still, the last thing this debate needs is more fear. Social science will just have to occupy itself with finding solutions.


---Joe Waggle, jwaggle@umd.edu
5 Comments
grandeurtechnologies link
11/9/2014 12:01:38 am

Great post!. :)

Reply
Defia Oktaviana link
7/7/2022 02:52:10 am

very good article

Reply
Defia Oktaviana link
7/7/2022 11:19:03 pm

very good article

Reply
DOFOLLOW Backlinks link
2/21/2023 01:15:57 pm

There is so much in this article that I would never have thought of on my own. Your content gives readers things to think about in an interesting way. Thank you for your clear information.

Reply
atika link
3/4/2023 09:11:28 am

In addition to fear, there are also moral and ethical concerns at play, as well as economic and political considerations. The role of fear in the climate change policy debate is complex, and it cannot be divorced from these other factors. Thank you

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2022
    May 2020
    August 2019
    May 2019
    January 2019
    April 2018
    January 2018
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    PSE Workshop

    RSS Feed

© Copyright 2013 - All rights reserved, Program for Society and the Environment