Program for Society and the Environment
  • Home
  • About
    • Graduate >
      • 2013-2014 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
      • 2014-2015 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
      • 2015-2016 Graduate Travel and Research Grant Recipients
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Fellows
    • Visitors
  • Research
    • The Climate Constituencies Project
    • Projects
    • Papers
  • Workshop
    • Workshop Schedule
  • Blog
  • Events
    • 2018 Protest Symposium
    • 2015 Urban Environmental Stewardship Conference
    • Past PSE Events
  • Contact Us
    • Planning Your Visit

CLIMATE cONSTITUENCIES PROJECT: It's not the science folks!

9/20/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
 In the past few weeks, the media and tweetosphere have been abuzz about climate denial, public opinion on energy and climate change, as well as how these issues are related to political polarization more broadly.  Much of the discussion has suggested that there is a link between public opinion and voting behavior, as well as the behavior of the policy actors who make the decisions about energy and climate policy in the United States.

This summer, the Climate Constituencies Project surveyed the top policy actors involved in climate and energy issues at the federal level and in four swing states: Florida, Nevada, North Carolina, and Ohio.  In each, the ‘top policy actors’ were identified using a methodology adapted from our previous work, which has been published in Nature Climate Change, and Contexts.  The pre-election survey component of the study closed in the beginning of September.  As part of it, we asked these policy actors their attitudes about the science of climate change.  Responses were scored on a scale of 1-5 ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, mean scores are reported in the table above. 

The results show that there is an overwhelming level of consensus around the science of climate change among policy actors at the Federal level and in these four swing states.  In fact, even with all of this talk of climate denial, opinions have gotten even stronger and the numbers have gone up since summer 2010 when we conducted a previous round of this research.  Across the four swing states and the federal level, there are no statistically significant differences in opinions on these questions.

When asked about potential policy instruments to address climate change and energy options, however, there was much less agreement.  Opinions around a potential cap-and-trade bill were statistically significantly different across the swing states and the federal levels, with policy actors in Florida and at the federal level having much lower opinions than the other states.

- Dana R. Fisher (drfisher@umd.edu)
1 Comment
Seth link
5/7/2019 04:49:51 pm

Thanks for posting this Dana!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2020
    August 2019
    May 2019
    January 2019
    April 2018
    January 2018
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    PSE Workshop

    RSS Feed

© Copyright 2013 - All rights reserved, Program for Society and the Environment